Back to Reviews
Future Music
Jon Musgrave
Portico™ 5042
- July 2007
- Visit product's page
Over the years various designers have put their name to classic pro audio. From the component-led design of a Pultec EQ to the creative beauty of a Moog synthesizer, you instantly know and trust the people behind the gear. In pro audio circles, no name is more renowned than Rupert Neve's. Over the years he's not only been responsible for some of the best audio designs ever created, he's also built up his fair share of companies, including Neve Audio, Focusrite and t now Rupert Neve Designs (RND). At 80 years of age you'd have thought a happy retirement would be uppermost in his mind, but as the latest Portico modules indicate, it's clearly not. This modular range of units (along with his new analogue mixing desk) are the fruits of his latest factory in Texas. Modular As you can see, the Portico units are small half-rack modules. There are seven units in the range including mic pres, EQs, compressors, a tape emulation line driver and a stereo field editor. The range covers a lot of ground in various different ways, with the true tape line driver probably the most innovatory product. Thanks to Sonic, the UK distributor, we have three of them to try out, the 5032 single channel mic pre/EQ, the 5042 twin channel true tape line driver and the 5043 twin channel compressor. Before looking at the individual units, it's worth considering the overall design concept Neve has applied here. First up, like the great designs from the 70s, these are discrete transistor-based circuits (so no valves), using singlesided (or Class A) amplifier designs. All units use new custom-designed input and output transformers and have balanced ins and outs on XLRs. This combined with the independent power supplies, and magnetically shielding steel enclosures means your Portico is about as isolated from ground loops, noise and interference as possible.
The 5042
The 5042 feels a little like the odd one
out in the Portico range. Designed to
emulate the sound that recording to
tape imparts (7.5IPS and 15IPS no
less), it's a simple-looking two-channel
unit with input level and saturation
controls. So how exactly does it go
about this?
Well, first up the sound associated
with tape recording is a combination of
many factors including the input/output
amplification, the emphasis/deemphasis
EQ circuits, the record and
replay heads, and the tape itself. The
5042 incorporates all these elements
minus the tape, allowing you to drive
the input heads in the way you would
when driving tape. To keep things
simple, the record and replay amplifiers
are coupled so that driving the input
reduces the replay level. And the tape
speed options reflect the different
emphasis/de-emphasis circuitry you'd
get on a tape deck.
So how does it sound? Quite frankly
brilliant! With tape emulation
engaged, the input trim at zero and the
saturation set to
minimum you
effectively have a
unity gain
situation. But
because the signal
isn't actually
bypassed you're
still getting the
initial effect of the circuitry. It's at this
stage that the differences between the
tape speeds first become apparent.
With the 7.5IPS setting, there's a
filling out of the low mids slightly, with
a taming effect on the high frequencies.
At 15 IPS the effect on the low mids is
less marked, but the real difference is
there's a noticeable high frequency lift.
The effect is like a subtle enhancer.
As you further push the saturation
control, the sonic differences become
more marked, but it's only when the
level meters hit the red that you might
re-consider. And with amplifier coupling
taking care of overall levels, you can
concentrate on the sound.
Overall the 15IPS option seems
better for using on mixes. The slower
tape speed is far more suited to taming
and thickening things such as drum
overheads. Either way both options are
far more varied than you may at first
think, and seriously addictive.
